Yesterday Srebrenica, Today Gaza

By Emina Bužinkić & Piro Rexepi

 

This article was first published on dversia (October 9th, 2024), a Bulgarian-based critical outlet. It has been republished here with the authors’ permission.

 

Instigated by Germany and Rwanda, the United Nations recently brought to the fore the question of the Bosnian genocide denial and proposed recognizing the mass massacre of over 8,347 Muslim men and boys at Srebrenica as an act of genocide. The resolution “condemns any denial of the Srebrenica genocide as a historical event and actions that glorify those convicted of war crimes, crimes against humanity and genocide by international courts”We are concerned with two questions in relation to this resolution: why now and with what intent?

It is an odd timing to adopt a resolution that reflects on and commemorates crimes that occurred almost 30 years ago amid the ongoing genocide in Gaza and military terror in the occupied Palestine. Of course we understand that in the context of wide-spread and orchestrated denial of both genocides, every recognition matters, but it shouldn’t come at the price of asking how some of those recognitions are surreptitiously legitimizing the ongoing genocide in Palestine – instrumentalised as they are by the US and Germany in particular.

Germany’s involvement in sponsoring the resolution, while actively supporting Israel’s genocide in Gaza, is even more concerning considering how the ongoing empowerment of racist, islamophobic and anti-Semitic politics are all being legitimized as historical processes of ‘righting past wrongs.’ The language expressed on the occasion of the adoption of the resolution, namely that the resolution “is about honouring the memory of the victims and supporting the survivors who continue to live with the scars of that fateful time” could not be more exemplary of how Muslim lives matter only after they are genocided. All of a sudden, a Muslim life of a Bosnian, not deemed worthy to be saved thirty years ago and not honored for thirty years into this day becomes superiorized over the ongoing genocide in Palestine. What we are witnessing through the whitewashing of the perpetrators, is the re-emergence of racial hierarchies and necropolitical reorganization of life. The normalization of genocidal violence could not be more obvious with Germany being the second largest supplier of weapons to Israel that are routinely used in IDF’s so-called “war operations” of killing as many Palestinians as possible in as little time as possible.

A protest in front of the German embassy in Zagreb, 16.04.2024. Photo: Marija Mileta. See a video from the protest here.

On the very day when the UN condemned the violations of the safe zone in Srebrenica-Potočari, the last sanctuary for over 1,5 million of displaced Palestinians – the city of Rafah – was under fire despite the International Court of Justice’s (ICJ) ask for Israel to stop further attacks. Within 48 hours of the ICJ’s ruling, Israel attacked Rafah for over 60 times with the bianco political support and weapons secured by Germany and the United States. The ICJ’s ruling from the January 26th based on the Genocide Convention did not call for ceasefire in Gaza but rather gave a whole month to the State of Israel to stop the attacks on Palestinians and do everything in their power to prevent genocide. This, despite the fact that a genocide had been unfolding in front of our eyes for months, with at least 35 000 forcibly pushed into the plastic bags and thrown in massive graveyards and thousands exposed to starvation. The response of the Israeli army was more death, more debilitation and suffocation of Gaza and the rest of occupied Palestine. The recent Lancet report warns about over 185,000 forever taken Palestinian lives. Israel experienced no sanctions despite the series of polite requests issued to them since. In her recent report on the anatomy of a genocide, the UN Special Rapporteur on Palestine Francesca Albanese declared that the acts of genocide have undoubtedly been met,

Israel has sought to conceal its eliminationist conduct of hostilities sanctioning the commission of international crimes as IHL-abiding. Distorting IHL customary rules, including distinction, proportionality and precautions, Israel has de facto treated an entire protected group and its life-sustaining infrastructure as ‘terrorist’ or ‘terrorist-supporting’, thus transforming everything and everyone into either a target or collateral damage, hence killable or destroyable. In this way, no Palestinian in Gaza is safe by definition. This has had devastating, intentional effects, costing the lives of tens of thousands of Palestinians, destroying the fabric of life in Gaza and causing irreparable harm to its entire population.

Israel has increasingly targeted Palestinian civilians and essential infrastructure, using international humanitarian law (IHL) terms to justify its actions. By the overly broad application of concepts like “human shields”, “collateral damage”, and “safe zones”, Israel has eroded the protective purpose of these terms, blurring the distinction between civilians and combatants in Gaza. Albanese called it a “humanitarian camouflage.” Humanitarian camouflage was also used by the US in collaboration with Israeli forces in the construction of the coastal pier in Gaza for supposed humanitarian purposes in May 2024. A few weeks later, after failing to fulfill its stated purpose to deliver much needed supplies to Palestinians, there has been strong allegations, including by the World Food Programme (WFP), that the same pier was used by IDF soldiers as a hiding place during the Nuseirat massacre, when Israeli forces killed 274 Palestinians in the Nuseirat refugee camp on June 8th of this year.

Article by: